Truth and Consequences

Truth and Consequences

Share this post

Truth and Consequences
Truth and Consequences
Someone Is Getting Indicted

Someone Is Getting Indicted

The legal noose is tightening on Donald Trump. Meanwhile, the Biden White House is taking the fight to Republicans and Democrats keep winning special elections.

Michael A. Cohen's avatar
Michael A. Cohen
Sep 02, 2022
∙ Paid
1

Share this post

Truth and Consequences
Truth and Consequences
Someone Is Getting Indicted
Share

I’m Michael A. Cohen, and this is Truth and Consequences: A no-holds-barred look at the absurdities, hypocrisies, and surreality of American politics. If you received this email - or you are a free subscriber - and you’d like to subscribe: you can sign up below.

Get 20% off for 1 year

When I served in government many years ago, if I had taken this material to my home and the FBI found it … I’d have gone to jail.

The material shown here is not your garden variety classified material. It includes SCI material, which stands for “sensitive compartmented information,” and one of the documents suggests that it could include “UP TO HCS-P/SI/TK.”

At the Washington Post, Philip Bump has spelled out what these acronyms mean:

  • “HCS-P” indicates material obtained from human sources, generally meaning informants or spies.

  • “SI” refers to communications intelligence, generally, material gathered from surveillance of online or telephone sources.

  • “TK” is short for “talent keyhole,” generally referring to satellite-based surveillance.

Simply put, Trump possessed classified materials that he wasn’t allowed to have — not only because they were highly classified, but because they weren’t his. Instead, they are the property of the US government. But that’s not even the worst of it.

As earlier affidavits from the government have shown, Trump obstructed the Justice Department from reclaiming these documents. His lawyers even signed statements in June claiming that all classified materials had been returned (they weren’t). It is precisely this obstruction that led the FBI to take the unprecedented step of procuring a search warrant to enter Mar-a-Lago and figure out what Trump had that he wasn't turning over. Contrary to the claims of Trump defenders that the FBI is engaged in a witch hunt against Trump or is seeking some political advantage against the likely 2024 opponent of President Trump, last month’s search was a direct result of the former president’s refusal to turn over material that the government had repeatedly and patiently requested. If Trump had simply returned all the documents he had last Spring when the Department of Justice started pressuring him, I doubt he’d face any legal scrutiny. Trump could have chalked the whole situation up to poor record-keeping. My guess is that considering his status as a former president, the FBI and Department of Justice would have let the matter drop. But that ship has most certainly sailed.

This is as close to a slam dunk legal case as you’re ever going to find. At this point, it would be shocking if Trump wasn’t indicted, not just for mishandling classified material and violating the presidential records act, but for obstructing justice. It’s genuinely hard to see what kind of defense Trump could mount. He’s alleged on his social media site, Truth Social, that he declassified the documents in question, yet his lawyers have made no such argument in court filings. And no markings on the documents suggest they’d been declassified.

According to an inventory of documents seized by the government (unsealed by a federal court this morning), the FBI found “dozens of empty folders with ‘classified’ banners” and found classified documents inter-mingled with Trump’s personal, unclassified documents. The mind reels at the level of incompetence and the security risks created by Trump’s actions. What possible defense could Trump have for keeping classified material in such a haphazard and insecure manner?

Even if the Department of Justice didn’t want to indict Trump over his actions, in this case, I’m not sure how they can avoid it. After all we’ve learned over the past several weeks, failure to act would represent a scandalous double standard. If, as Attorney General Merrick Garland has repeatedly stated, no one is above the law, then Trump must be indicted for actions that would send any other American to prison.

Biden’s Speech

President Biden speaks at Independence Hall Sept. 1, 2022, on his second visit to Pennsylvania in three days. He delivered a prime time speech from this area, focused on the “Soul of the Nation.”
Tom Gralish/Philadelphia Inquirer

Last night, President Biden traveled to Philadelphia to deliver a prime-time speech that his aides had billed as a warning to Americans about the ongoing assault on America’s democratic values. The address was partly that, but it was mainly a campaign speech intended to set the stage for the upcoming midterm elections. That’s not a criticism of Biden. I’m all for the president warning about the dangers that Trump and his supporters represent to American democracy. But it’s hardly a coincidence that Biden gave this speech the Thursday before the traditional kick-off of the Fall campaign (Labor Day weekend) and not two months ago (when the threats to democracy were just as real). Biden and his advisors want the fall campaign to be a referendum on Trump — and with good reason. The former president is deeply unpopular. He, quite reasonably, scares the hell out of millions of Americans. For the last two election cycles (2018 and 2020), fear and hatred of Trump have been a huge motivating factor in helping Democrats win elections. Every day that the political focus is on Trump, not the economy, inflation, or gas prices, is a good day for Democrats.

The focus on Trump is part of a larger and increasingly aggressive White House political strategy. We saw the first signs of this last week when the usually staid White House Twitter feed lambasted Republicans who criticized the president’s student loan forgiveness program … for having their own Paycheck Protection Program loans forgiven by the federal government.

Twitter avatar for @WhiteHouse
The White House @WhiteHouse
Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene had $183,504 in PPP loans forgiven.
Twitter avatar for @Acyn
Acyn @Acyn
Greene: For our government just to say ok your debt is completely forgiven.. it’s completely unfair https://t.co/V0yJWYSbot
9:33 PM ∙ Aug 25, 2022
820,354Likes218,620Retweets

It’s a move that cheered Democratic partisans, but it also showed that Biden is more than happy to get in the political muck. Since then, there’s been a definite and notable shift in what the White House is saying. Indeed, here are a few recent tweets from the WH Twitter feed.

Twitter avatar for @WhiteHouse
The White House @WhiteHouse
MAGA Republican elected officials refuse to accept the results of free and fair elections. 147 Congressional Republicans voted to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.
nytimes.comThe 147 Republicans Who Voted to Overturn Election Results (Published 2021)Republican lawmakers raised objections to the official certification of electoral votes in a joint session of Congress that went into the wee hours of Thursday morning, in a futile effort to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. See who supported the objections.
12:15 AM ∙ Sep 2, 2022
23,848Likes7,948Retweets
Twitter avatar for @WhiteHouse
The White House @WhiteHouse
President Biden wants to strengthen American manufacturing. And, he’s not alone. In fact, 78% of Americans support provisions providing tax incentives to create more manufacturing jobs here in the U.S. How many Congressional Republicans voted for these incentives? Zero.
9:00 PM ∙ Aug 31, 2022
6,629Likes1,676Retweets
Twitter avatar for @WhiteHouse
The White House @WhiteHouse
By the Numbers – Prescription Drug Costs under President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act: $2,000 – new annual cap on these out-of-pocket costs for seniors. 81% – how many Americans support capping these costs for seniors. Zero – how many Congressional Republicans voted for it.
5:37 PM ∙ Aug 31, 2022
6,786Likes1,812Retweets
Twitter avatar for @WhiteHouse
The White House @WhiteHouse
A majority of Americans support a woman’s right to choose. It’s clear who doesn’t.
A woman's right to choose

For it?
1. Congressional Democrats
2. A majority of Americans

Against it?
1. Congressional Republicans
2. Extreme justices on the Supreme Court
4:00 PM ∙ Aug 28, 2022
14,423Likes2,975Retweets

Go back to early August or July, and the White House Twitter feed never even uttered the word “Republican.” Now, it is regularly attacking members of the GOP. Moreover, as was evident in Biden’s speech yesterday, the White House has decided to turn “MAGA Republican” into an epithet. It’s not that Democrats can’t run on their record of accomplishment — they can and they should. But American politics in 2022 is far more about demonizing the other party (and the other guy). To some extent, that’s always been the case in politics, but it’s even more true now, when the battle lines could not be more apparent. In short, the game is on, and Biden is taking the fight directly to Republicans.

Meanwhile in Alaska

Watch Sarah Palin on "The Masked Singer" Rapping "Baby Got Back"

In political news, Democrats won yet another special election — this time in Alaska. In the race to succeed Rep. Don Young, who died in March, Democrat Mary Peltola emerged victorious from a crowded field, which included former 2008 Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Truth and Consequences to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Michael A. Cohen
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share